A skill bar chart looks precise. To a parser, it's usually just an image — and images don't extract as data.
ATS resume graphics covers any visual, image-based element on a resume — skill-level bar charts, infographic-style timelines, headshots, decorative borders, embedded logos — and the specific parsing risk they introduce, distinct from text-based formatting issues like columns or tables.
Graphics are appealing precisely because they can communicate certain kinds of information efficiently and attractively to a human reader — a bar chart showing skill proficiency at a glance, a clean timeline graphic showing career progression visually. This visual efficiency is exactly what fails to translate to a parsing engine, which extracts text content, not visual meaning.
This is conceptually the broadest category covered in this troubleshooting series — icons are a specific, narrow type of graphic, but this guide covers the full range: photos, charts, infographic elements, decorative design flourishes, and embedded logos, all of which share the same fundamental limitation when it comes to ATS parsing.
The underlying principle is simple even though the specific graphic types vary widely: if information is communicated purely through a visual image rather than through actual, extractable text characters, an ATS generally cannot read it, regardless of how clear or well-designed that visual might be to a human eye.
Graphics fail to parse for a straightforward technical reason: an embedded image, regardless of what it depicts, contains pixel data, not text data. A parsing engine extracting text content from a document has no built-in mechanism to interpret the visual meaning of a picture — it can potentially recognize that an image exists in a certain location, but it generally cannot read a bar chart and determine that it represents "Python: 90%, SQL: 75%."
This becomes a particular problem with infographic-style resumes, which have grown in popularity partly because they stand out visually in a crowded, template-saturated job market. Ironically, the more a resume leans into infographic-style visual communication to stand out to a human reviewer, the more information it often loses entirely for the automated review stage that happens first.
Skill-level bar charts and progress-bar graphics are an especially common and especially risky pattern, because they're frequently the only place a specific skill and its associated level are communicated at all — if the chart doesn't parse, that information isn't just degraded, it can be completely absent from what the ATS stores.
Headshots and decorative borders carry a different, smaller risk profile — they're less likely to be central to your qualifications, but they can still occasionally interfere with document structure or add unnecessary file complexity, and in some hiring contexts, including a photo carries considerations beyond just parsing, related to reducing unconscious bias in the screening process.
When a parser encounters an embedded image in your resume, its handling depends on the specific system, but the most common outcome is that the image is simply skipped entirely during text extraction — the parser recognizes there's a non-text element present and moves on to the next text content, leaving no equivalent information captured in its place.
Some more advanced systems may attempt optical character recognition on embedded images, especially if the image is flagged as containing text-like content, but this is not a standard or reliable capability across most Applicant Tracking Systems, and should never be assumed or relied upon as a fallback.
The practical consequence is that any information communicated purely through a graphic — a skill chart, an infographic timeline of your career progression, a visually creative summary of your qualifications — is very likely to be entirely absent from the version of your resume that actually gets searched, scored, and ranked, even though it may be the most visually prominent, carefully designed part of the document you submitted.
One of the highest-risk graphic types, since the chart is often the only place a specific skill level is communicated at all.
Visually striking and memorable to a human reviewer, but often catastrophic for ATS parsing since most of the actual content is embedded as images rather than text.
While lower risk than content-carrying graphics, decorative images can still add unnecessary file complexity and, in some cases, factor into broader hiring-bias considerations.
If a chart or infographic element is the only place specific information appears, and it doesn't parse, that information is effectively gone from the ATS record.
This is not a standard, reliable capability across most systems and should never be assumed as a fallback for graphic-based content.
A resume meant primarily for online, automated submission should generally prioritize parsing reliability over visual creativity.
Charts, infographic elements, headshots, decorative borders, embedded logos — list each one specifically.
Skill charts and infographic timelines usually do; headshots and decorative borders usually don't.
Convert a skill bar chart into a simple "Skill — Level" bulleted list conveying the same information in extractable text.
Headshots, decorative borders, and embedded logos can generally be removed without losing any substantive information.
A more graphic-heavy version can still be useful for a personal portfolio site or a printed leave-behind, just not for ATS-facing digital submissions.
Confirm all previously graphic-communicated information now extracts correctly as readable text.
Confirm nothing substantive was lost in the process of converting from graphics to plain text.
Preserves the same information in a fully extractable, ATS-safe format.
These carry parsing risk and added complexity without conveying any information essential to your qualifications.
A personal portfolio website or printed copy can showcase visual creativity without risking a lost automated screening.
If information matters to your candidacy, it should exist as extractable text somewhere in the document, not solely as a visual element.
Confirms definitively whether specific graphic elements are causing information loss during parsing.
Removing unnecessary embedded images also tends to keep file size smaller and more broadly compatible across different upload systems.
Built an entirely graphic-based resume with icon-driven sections, a skills radar chart, and a stylized timeline graphic for work history. A parse test extracted almost no usable content at all — nearly the entire resume was communicated through images, leaving the ATS-stored version close to empty despite the file looking impressive and professional to a human viewer.
Used horizontal progress-bar graphics to indicate proficiency in five key sales tools. Testing showed the tool names extracted as plain text nearby, but the specific proficiency levels shown only in the bar graphics were entirely lost, understating his actual, well-developed expertise.
Included a professional headshot in the top corner of the resume for a role in a region where this is a common convention. While the photo itself didn't affect keyword-based text extraction, converting the surrounding decorative border elements to plain text formatting improved overall parsing reliability.
Had a visually appealing infographic timeline showing job titles and years as a graphic element rather than text. After a parse test confirmed this section extracted as entirely blank, rebuilding it as a standard chronological list of job titles and dates preserved the same career narrative in a fully ATS-readable format.
| Graphic Type | Information Risk | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Skill-level bar/progress charts | High — often the sole source of that data | Rebuild as plain "Skill — Level" text |
| Infographic timelines/summaries | Very high | Rebuild entirely as standard chronological text |
| Headshots | Low for parsing, other considerations apply | Optional; remove for most ATS-facing submissions |
| Decorative borders/logos | Low–Medium | Remove for digital, ATS-facing versions |
Most do, since parsing engines extract text content and generally have no reliable mechanism for interpreting the visual meaning of an image.
Less so for text extraction specifically, though it can add file complexity, and photo inclusion carries its own separate considerations depending on region and company policy.
Only if the same information — the specific skill and its level — also exists somewhere as plain, extractable text; the chart alone should never be the sole source of that data.
They're specifically designed to stand out visually to a human reviewer, which is a real and valid goal — the issue is they're generally unsuited for the automated, ATS-facing stage most applications pass through first.
Yes — a personal portfolio site or a printed copy for networking events can showcase visual design without the parsing risk relevant only to ATS-facing digital submissions.
Not necessarily — clean typography, thoughtful spacing, and clear section organization can create a professional, polished look without relying on image-based graphics.
Generally no — standard text extraction doesn't include optical character recognition, and this capability shouldn't be assumed or relied upon.
Usually low risk in isolation, though it adds unnecessary complexity; removing it for ATS-facing submissions is a reasonable simplification.
Run a scan or parse test and check whether the information that graphic was meant to convey — a skill level, a timeline — appears anywhere in the extracted text output.
In that specific context the parsing risk doesn't apply, though it's often difficult to know for certain whether a resume will pass through an ATS at some stage even when sent directly.
Yes — heavy use of embedded images can increase file size, which in rare cases may exceed upload limits on some job portals or slow down processing.
Rely on typography, spacing, and text formatting for visual clarity, and reserve genuinely graphic-heavy designs for non-ATS contexts like a portfolio site.
BanaoResume's templates communicate every skill and detail as clean, extractable text — never a chart or graphic — so nothing essential is ever invisible to the systems reading your resume first.
Build Your Free ATS Resume →